An intelligence of sufficient capacity might perhaps be able to conceive of all events as standing to each other in the relation of cause and effect; and though the most powerful of human minds are unequal to efforts which fall infinitely short of this, it is possible not only to trace the connection between cause and effects, both in regard to human conduct and in regard to inanimate matter, to every considerable lengths, but to see that numerous events are connected together, although the precise nature of the links which connect them may not be open to observation.
The CASE was purely administrative, based on the evidence presented by the complainant; the iota of the case was purely based on hearsay, on her doubts about the truth of the matter that keeps on haunting her all through out that period of delusional moment of her pathetic life. She presented different kinds of pictures and or photographs and a series of videos which obviously irrelevant to the issues of the case. It was an error on her part to present such evidence because there will be an admission on her part that such photographs and videos existed, and it was her who took the photographs and later on presented it as her evidence,. Much worst that such admission were written in her affidavit and notarized, she just gave the respondent the opportunity to charge her with one crime and prosecuted her of another crime of a very different and dissimilar crime.
And the respondent filed a criminal complaint against her at the fiscal’s office and during the preliminary investigation she failed to appear at all the scheduled hearings which prompted the investigating prosecutor to elevate the case at the court of justice where the presiding judge issued the warrant of arrest. She has 4 criminal cases pending and for those 4 criminal cases there is an outstanding 3 warrant of arrest against her. Is it not ironic that the evidence she presented at the administrative case she filed against the respondent was the same evidence of paper documents that respondent used against her at the criminal case which the respondent filed against her and also the basis of the issuance of the warrant of arrest against her.
This is an actual case where the author represents the respondent in the administrative case, and now the complainant-lady has an outstanding warrant of arrest at the court of justice. HER evidence greatly helped the respondent for the issuance of HER warrant of arrest.
